A love letter from Paris


I write this to you as a hot sweaty love letter from Paris, the city of romance and adults who are allowed to stay out late at night. As you gather in Sydney I am meeting with a large group of dreamers and makers who are part of a growing movement of discontent with the economy. This is a global movement variously called the solidarity economy, peer to peer, or transition, post-growth economies, or simply ‘the commons’. It is not called the share economy because some dickheads from Silicon valley ruined that word already. Although as I scribe from this venue bedecked in an astro turfed and bamboo veneer decor, I am not 100 per cent convinced the viral bandwagon of collaborative consumption and positive capitalism hasn’t already entered the building. It feels a bit like Vivid and TEDX combined their event and asked Hillsong if they could do the catering and the lighting/Sound in a big circus tent at Tumbalong Park in Darling Harbour. ANYHOO the message is pretty clear: we need some new models. 

From bitcoin to data commons to ride share to co-working, many conventional business providers are looking to cooperatives and social enterprises to help support or to benefit their communities. They speak of a things like triple bottom line, and collaboration, and social engagement. To those of us who are barely make their living from the arts, these are not novel ideas. But their rapid uptake by the corporate sector is interesting to reflect on.

Why are other sectors and business having this conversation about changing the business model, and the arts isn’t? Especially when it never worked for us in the first place. So in my recent suite of works exploring art and economy, I have been pondering the following questions:

1. What specific elements of the conventional business model don’t work for the arts?

2. What do artists in the small to medium sector already do well when organising their own production and distribution?

3. How can we shape our economy with the particular language we use to describe what we do as specific and important?

4. Who is speaking for artists and art workers and is their decision making informed by their practice?


These questions have helped shape MONEY LAUNDERING which is the obvious name you give to a quest to build the worlds first artist run laundromat. The idea is pretty simple but as yet untested. But in theory it is being designed to fit the business model to the practice—not the other way around. The artist run laundromat is a response to the feast and famine which is characteristic of the gig-economy. It will result in a functional commercial enterprise, governed by a shared equity model, that will prioritise the artist’s working life as a practising artist by offering unconditional flexible paid work (as a laundromat attendant) to cover living costs during periods where the artist is in between gigs or selectively inactive. The physical space of the laundromat will also function as a hub for artist activity and presentations, as well as being an ongoing site for experimentation in artist led practice and fair-share economic models.

This idea is a practical idea underpinned by some serious reflection about no longer wanting to simply do the best we can within the sad and limited prospects of an economy designed by a handful of people with terrible imaginations and suspect motives. Artists need to come up with new models to survive, but these models need to come from a thorough overhaul and redesign of the entire economy.


I want to propose a set of principles for a practice-led economy; this an idea that ties decision making to the bodies that will enact them and/or be impacted by them. It a design that eliminates the role of the manager/middleman, as the man who stands outside of the embodied practice, whose decisions are executed by others, and whose body will not be affected by any adverse fallout but instead benefit from the negative impact it has on others. We need to consider an alternative to this where the body and the practice are tethered to decision making.


Here are some elements that I have started to write about as forming a set of values and ideas to articulate how an artist led economy would behave.


It recognises that its spheres of labour and social are messy and conflated, and bound up in reproducing each other.


The bee produces honey but this is many ways a by product to its real function which is to pollinate. The artists economy works better when it is considered as a conduit and fertiliser of relations.

Movement: Processual, Flux, Flow

We don’t capture but momentarily apprehend, and we flourish when we keep the the gift in circulation

Indeterminacy (becoming-unbecoming)

Along with keeping things in flux, we also understand things as constantly forming, like who we are, and we create the conditions to allow this to happen.

Open Source

Ideas and knowledge grow best through sharing.

Mutual Aid

No hands held out for charity. We consider the contributions we make according to the values that we decide on.


Our identities shift across a spectrum, and we enjoy the benefits of a proliferation of constantly differentiating binaries. Never a full stop static binary which is the logic of cancer.

Nothing about us without us

We represent ourselves and all decisions are made by those who will be affected by them


The shape of our production and distribution is shaped by the practice and the needs of those who practice it.


First nations people were right. You can not own the land, you can only belong to the land.

Design models where care and roles and responsibility are embedded into legal structures governing the care of shared resources such as land, air and water.


It is possible for people to own too much to control too many things, to be too busy. No more franchises. If you have an idea, don’t replicate it. Give your idea to someone else and see what they do to it.

Generative not Reductive – Abundance not Scarcity – Distribution not Accumulation

Spread it round, spread it open and release it into circulation. Keep it moving!


MSE + Money Laundering + Iron Lady is heading over the seas!

So much excitement!

Marrickville School of Economics has been selected to present a module as part of the Live Art Development Agency (London) DIY artist series in August 2017 and then presenting at the Folkestone Fringe in Sept, 2017.

Walking to the Laundromat audio walk will be presented as a practice-based paper at the New Materialisms conference in Paris.

Money Laundering will be taking part in the Synergia Institute  in Tuscany in July 2017 to connect with leaders in the P2P economy.

Iron Lady will be in development at PAF for the Everywhere & Elsewhere residency just outside of Paris.

And as if that wasn’t enough excitement, I will presenting all these projects at OuiShare in Paris July 5-7.

We are running a small fundraising campaign to cover the costs. We have made some beautiful Teatowels please visit here to place your order:

Or simply fill out your order here!


The Artist’s Exceptional Labouring Body – MCA/Artbar

Sumugan Sivanesan and I performed a lecture of sorts as an experiment in the artist’s exceptional labouring body in 3D! As part of Artbar at the Museum of Contemporary Art July 29 curated by Wade Marynowsky.

The introductory text:

This event is a work in progress in the sense that the artist work is never done. These conceptual nuggets are paraded here as raw material, half baked and unfolding. In a state of becoming. In a state of human. And as a performative resistance to becoming human capital.

We will present a number of resonant statements. Accompanied by images. We will try to resist becoming human capital by drawing attention to the human capital.  This might be reminiscent of the ways in which one draws attention to their fears in order to diminish them.

For these purposes we want to draw attention to our artist fee, as singular coins encased in these two display jars in front here. Each jar contains 200 x one dollar coins.

Your participation can happen in several ways. You can shift this capital from one jar to the other, in a simple act of making capital flow. You can extract capital from this act if you feel you have expended time and have not been compensated in other more intangible forms either through your enjoyment or knowledge gained. And finally you can add to this capital by departing with some of your own capital into one of the jars, and in this way contribute to the further extension of these ideas by expanding the bank accounts of the presenting artists. 

You have been given an opportunity to bear witness to what will follow, and you will exert energy in participating, attempting to decode and reassemble in your own mind and inside your own exceptional body what takes place here.

Our focus here is on the artist’s exceptional labouring body. These are bodies we describe as excessive bodies, or bodies that both exceed the capture by capital, and at the same time are increasingly marinated in and absorbed by capital.

At various points as we labour through this presentation, we may inject moments of ourselves and our own personal experiences in the pursuit of this open autopsy of artistic process.

We have prepared some images, and we have prepared some devices for viewing these images. We have prepared some notes, but our intention tonight is to unfold these thoughts, not necessarily in the order they were conceived, and as other ideas occur to us—triggered by our corporeal presence here tonight in the presence of other exceptional bodies—we take pause and reflect where necessary, or where possible, we may interact as two bodies in dialogue.